Friday, May 9, 2008

Stop being the Intellectual Whore!!


Sally: We are just going to be friends, OK?
Harry: Great, friends. It's the best thing...You realize, of course, that we can never be friends.
Sally: Why not?
Harry: What I'm saying is - and this is not a come-on in any way, shape, or form - is that men and women can't be friends, because the sex part always gets in the way.
Sally: That's not true. I have a number of men friends and there is no sex involved.
Harry: No, you don't.
Sally: Yes, I do.
Harry: No, you don't.
Sally: Yes, I do.
Harry: You only think you do.
Sally: You're saying I'm having sex with these men without my knowledge?
Harry: No, what I'm saying is they all want to have sex with you.
Sally: They do not.
Harry: Do too.
Sally: They do not.
Harry: Do too.
Sally: How do you know?
Harry: Because no man can be friends with a woman that he finds attractive. He always wants to have sex with her.
Sally: So you're saying that a man can be friends with a woman he finds unattractive.
Harry: No, you pretty much want to nail them, too.
Sally: What if they don't want to have sex with you?
Harry: Doesn't matter, because the sex thing is already out there, so the friendship is ultimately doomed, and that is the end of the story.

When a man meets a woman, the first thing that pops into his mind, be it consciously or subconsciously, is "What are the possibilities of me having sex with this woman?"

When a woman meets a man, the first thing that pops into her mind, be it consciously or subconsciously, is "Is this guy someone I'd want to have sex with, or is he good to just be friends with?" Unlike the man, women have a "bi-ladderal" system, or two ladders. One is the Good Ladder, on which all men she would like to have sex with are on, much like the man's ladder. The other ladder is the Friends Ladder, a ranking of all the guys she knows and likes as a friend, but would never have sex with. Ever. At the bottom of and between both ladders is the abyss, which if a man tries to make a ladder jump from the Friends Ladder to the Good Ladder and fails, he will likely fall into, since once a woman has a male friend who suddenly tells her he wants her, things tend to go awry quickly and they split, or the man becomes unhappy and leaves her life, via a NEXT.

According to Ladder Theory, men are attracted to a woman 60% based on looks, 30% on how easily he sleep with her, and 10% to other factors. Likewise, women are attracted to men 50% based on the man's wealth or power status, 40% on attraction (which further breaks down into subcategories, the largest of which is looks), and 10% on other factors.

One of the major tenets of Ladder Theory is the relationship known as the Intellectual Whore/Intellectual Pimp dynamic. This can also be equated with "nice guys", and should be a common observance. A man who is too "nice" and unwilling to show his dominant, sex-hungry side, will instead approach a lady as non-chalant and unthreateningly as possible, attempting to have a friendship with her to prove that he can be trusted first. This is all done with the hidden agenda of eventually confessing his feelings to her and attempting to have sex with her. This also typically involves the man buying her gifts, giving her rides to places, voluntarily taking the short end of the stick at every occasion, and basically being a doormat, in order to prove that he is "a good guy," but generally it translates to the woman as "weak." Then when he eventually comes forward with his feelings towards her, known as a ladder jump, it typically takes the woman by surprise and she rejects his offer. It is termed a ladder jump because usually the man tries to work his way up her Friends Ladder first, and from the top of the ladder, tries to "jump" across to her Good Ladder. But as stated earlier, by this point he has likely been seen as weak and a doormat, not to mention if there was any sexual tension in their first encounter, it's likely worn off by the time the ladder jump comes around. What typically happens next is that the IW will hold on to their friendship, since it's all he has - which is settling for less in his mind - and he typically rises back up to the top of the IP's Friends Ladder, and then stays there, delusionally content, and/or waiting for his next opportunity to try another Ladder Jump.

The man, in this scenario is known as an intellectual whore, or "IW". An intellectual whore is a man who readily pays a woman with his emotional support so that he may receive physical returns, which again, is hardly ever successful.

The woman in this scenario is referred to as an intellectual pimp, but in most cases, the woman is not aware that she is the man's intellectual pimp, or "IP". This is due to the man's concealing of his true desires with her. There are cases of course, where the woman realizes exactly what's going on from the beginning, and chooses to abuse her power as an IP, and this woman is known as a ninja bitch, or "NB".

The Solution

Most IPs will spend their time talking and being friends with the IW, while he receives no physical return from her, besides perhaps being the occasional cuddle bitch, while she runs off to have her sex with an Outlaw Biker or "OB" instead, and then vent her frustrations over him to the IW. She will have sex with this OB repeatedly, and then always air her stories and frustrations over his emotional distance to the IW. The IW will typically respond with, "well he's a jerk," "you deserve someone better," and likewise supplicating statements.

Ladder Theory purports that to avoid IWism and to begin attracting women in an effective manner, one must avoid falling into the IW/IP trap by avoiding supplication, acting disinterested in women he is actually interested in, becoming an OB, or getting rich.

--Source: Ladder Wiki and a chain email amongst friends.
Also see this hilarious strip:

http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/things_fall_apart.png

15 comments:

Manu Kant said...

I dont agree about the girls that they are into looks.. They are into something which they only know and it is very specific one person's needs and wants.
The look part is just the bonus for them. And just to make it more clear, you wud be amazed to see what girls find good looking and I know this for a fact from various observations and experiences that the above thing holds true. Otherwise, yeh muhaawra kabhi nahin banta: "Langoor ke munh mein angoor" :) I hope I make it quite clear..

Ladder Theory Proponent said...

hehe dude.. believe me.. they are... girls have tld me on my face..
http://www.laddertheory.com/ratingsystem.htm

"As to the first point, that of money. Well most guys know that women dig guys with money. Would Donald Trump be fucking models if he wasn't rich? That question is rhetorical. Now I don't even believe this is wrong, I think it is just nature. But I also think women who are this way (and it is almost all of you) should be honest and admit that they are basically whores, and stop saying bad things about the so-called "actual whores" who are just trying to earn an honest living.

Most women read this and say something like, "Well I'm not the average woman because..blah...blah...not true...blah blah...my boyfriend/lover/husband/masseuse was poor...blah...blah."

If you thought something like this you are very likely the average woman. If you read it and went "Hmmm..." and then you went back to doing physics, then you have a case.

Looks are not to be discounted. I see many girls revert to about a seventh grade emotional level when they see some guy at the club, or some guy from a crappy movie. I think everyone has seen this phenomena, and it seems to have become an alarming trend in women of increasing age.

The attraction category is broken down further in the next section. This is a change from previous versions of the ladder theory that included looks here instead of attraction. I feel this is a more accurate depiction, as evidenced by experiment and peer review.

The last 10% was my effort to give women the benefit of the doubt. A common question men ask of women is "Tell me what you want in a man?", which is like asking how many guys she's slept with, an invitation to be lied to. Because she'll almost invariably answer with some combination of

• sense of humor
• intelligence
• sensitivity
• emotional stability

As far as I can tell this is mostly rubbish. But in an effort to be fair I have included this, since there seem to be a few rare cases of this. Just none that I have ever seen.

Another thing to watch out for is the code words women use. Here is a translation guide for dealing with women.

Says: I want a man who is motivated and has goals.
Means: I want a rich man

Says: I want a man who knows how to treat a woman.
Means: I want a rich man

Says: He's from a really good family.
Means: He's from a really rich family."

som said...

Good research!! But I disagree with this FUNDA...Guys are usually not so fool that they don't understand what they are doing...This is the story or FUNDA from and for the frustrated guys..There are people (with good numbers) who win their gals even after being nice to her (like the IW). This is the story of weaker guys and smart gals. You can write stories about smart guys and weaker gals where gals are at the losing side. So, it's all about knowing your potential and choosing right people (life partner or sex object) for you. Also, be clear what do you want from the other person and also from your life.

I am not a sex crazy person who go out and put every gal on the LADDER. :-)..

-som

Ladder theory said...

Lol ^^^^

1. Obviously there are some guys in this world who want smarter girls for them (and not weaker girls, as the preceding comment writer desires). This funda is for helping out those people, so they don't make mistakes in trying for a girl who actually tries to classify boys she really wants to be with, and not some loser girl who's ready to be with any guy on this planet (ie the bhenji types)

2. Life partners and sex objects are mutually exclusive??!? Don't you wanna have sex with your wife??!

3. In the Indian context, the ladder theory has been modified slightly by the presence of the 3rd ladder for women.. ie the marriage ladder. Girls compromise because of parents/family pressure and marry a loser, who she probably will never even be able to look upto, and have a drab life thereafter.

4. I believe the blog-owner, by his experience in the US, can vouch for the shit-tests girls put boys through.

5. Considering the amount of research that is available on the net, I will rather trust these "theories for frustrated people" than go out looking for a weaker bhenji. Some people try to look up.. not down.

:)
Peace

Source: Personal views

ladder theory said...

Plus, we do know our potential, and we do desire sex objects. We'll hire a maid to take care of our daily lives.

ladder theory said...

Manu bhaiya.. Girls are into looks... ask them, they'll tell you (Don't ask the bhenji types, who say sense of humor or whatever crap like that. They can masturbate watching The Great Indian Laughter Challenge). They do prefer good looking guys, but good looking guys are a rare commodity these days (considering a vast majority of us are pizza eating/kheer drinking bloated bastards, living in the hope that our parents will get a life partner for us (and consequently not grooming ourselves at all). So the only alternative is to compromise on the looks part.

But then the thing you mentioned about "specific one person's needs and wants".. is actually the girl approving the boy based on his passing the shit-tests the girl puts him through. This comes instantly to some people, I'm sure you would vouch for the fact based on your personal observations ;)

Manu Kant said...

Boss, if ure that man enough to put everything in pen and paper.. and do let me know ur name.. Atlease i will know that who is the guy who thinks that i have dated all bhenjis... This could be an eye-opener for me too u see..

ladder theory said...

I see you never got what I said. I never said you dated bhenjis. I said don't ask bhenji type girls about whether they want good looking guys or not.

The other replies were for "som"'s comments.

Trust me I know who you dated ;)
Respect _bows down_

som said...

Ha ha...Lol..

People in this world still believe that they can become smart by going through some theories and hunt for smart gals. Lol..

I would suggest "Ladder Theory" to utilize his time by working on his skills rather than reading crappy theories. It's always good to read stuffs but concluding things on the basis of those stuffs...no comments!! Why don't you go and try something out..I am sure you will stop believing bookish knowledge and understand how smart gals think ;-)...lol

I know a lot people who don't even deserve a "bhenji" and run after smart gals (and think they are smart enough)..I understand your desire :D...Good luck with your maid!!

Manu Kant said...

First of all, see I can see a Manu in you.. which I was maybe 3 years back. But, after all the things happened, I came to know that no girls is behanji and noone is hot. If you treat girls equally you wud automatically what I am trying to say.. It is just because you still distinguish between the girls witha tag and for the same reason the "hot" females gets to know that you are after them. So believe it or not you are not following the solution given in the blog. Trust me Dude!! The solution is right and if you "respect bow down" then for the same I'll tell you that this is why I say girls dont go for looks..

PS: I would definitely would want to know who I am talking to..

som said...

Sober and unusual MANU...Good to see u in this RUP :-)

-som

Suchintya said...

He he ... nice observations all. Just that from my experince, "Mr. Nice Guy" never gets anywhere with a female, although he might get to marry her after ...

I endorse the ladder theory. Good work there ! And nice post.

sid said...

haha! interesting read.. i somehow feel guys cud/maybe have a similar bi group thing with 1 grp being the women he would like to sleep/love (note how i alternatively use the word hehe) and the 2nd being the just friends grp.. of course, unlike in women's case.. here a switch from friend to sleep would have no overhead/switching costs and would be most welcome ;) lol

TS said...

I haven't read a better article in ages. Brilliant work UJ!

I am going to stop being an IW from right this moment! Ha ha!

Rajat said...

Very 'hat-ke' thought, and very true in spirit. Gals 2 play d IW role at timez, but then obvly guyz do it 80% of d time. Nice guyz (like myself :) find it tuf to break d IW..I hate this term..so lets call it IS(Intellectual Singles)..coz they r nt natural OBs n this unfair corporate world, its tuf getting rich if u remain a nice guy. :)
Good read and a very courageous unbiased viewpoint. Where did u read it UW?

How did you like this article (1-5) ?